Keywords
bioprosthetic valve
aortic valve replacement
stentless valve
structural valve deterioration
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction: The Freestyle® stentless porcine aortic root (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) has emerged as a valuable option for aortic valve replacement (AVR), offering superior hemodynamics compared to stented bioprostheses and eliminating the need for lifelong anticoagulation required with mechanical valves. Derived from a porcine aortic root, the Freestyle valve allows for versatile implantation techniques, including subcoronary, root inclusion, and full root replacement. While the Freestyle valve demonstrates excellent hemodynamics and benefits, as well as acceptable long-term survival, challenges remain regarding structural valve deterioration (SVD) in younger patients and technical complexities during implantation. These technical complexities include the need for precise surgical expertise, the stentless nature of the prosthesis, dense adhesions, and circumferential calcification of the porcine root. Emerging technologies, such as advanced anti-calcification treatments and tissue engineering, may further enhance its durability. In this article, we present two illustrative cases from our institution to highlight these challenges and discuss surgical strategies, as well as synthesize current evidence and discuss future directions for stentless bioprosthetic valves.
Conclusion: The Medtronic Freestyle stentless bioprosthetic valve offers significant hemodynamic benefits and acceptable durability in appropriately selected patients. However, late failure of the Freestyle stentless aortic root bioprosthetic can present as catastrophic pseudoaneurysm formation or severe leaflet degeneration with rupture. Prosthesis excision requires complex surgical strategies, including the need for root replacement and tailored coronary reimplantation.
References
Aluru JS, Barsouk A, Saginala K, Rawla P, Barsouk A. Valvular Heart Disease Epidemiology. Med Sci (Basel). 2022 Jun 15;10(2):32. doi: 10.3390/medsci10020032. PMID: 35736352; PMCID: PMC9228968
Stuart J. Head, Mevlüt Çelik, A. Pieter Kappetein, Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement, European Heart Journal, Volume 38, Issue 28, Jul 21, 2017, Pages 2183–2191, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx141
G. Svensson, David H. Adams, Robert O. Bonow, Aortic Valve and Ascending Aorta Guidelines for Management and Quality Measures, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Volume 95, Issue 6, Supplement, 2013, Pages S1-S66, ISSN 0003-4975, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.083.
Mehmet Ezelsoy, Kerem Oral, Kemal Tolga Saracoglu, Long Term Outcomes of Freestyle Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis: A Single Center Experience, The Heart Surgery Forum #2019-2661 23 (1), 2020 [Epub February 2020] doi: 10.1532/hsf.2661
Doty DB, Cafferty A, Kon ND, Huysmans HA, Krause AH Jr, Westaby S. Medtronic Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis: Implant techniques. J Card Surg. 1998 Sep-Oct;13(5):369-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1998.tb01099.x. PMID: 10440652.
Davy Cheng, John Pepper, Janet Martin; Stentless Versus Stented Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. March 2009, Innovations Technology and Techniques in Cardiology, 4(2):61-73; DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e3181a3484b
Perez de Arenaza D, Lees B, Flather M, et al. Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis: effects on left ventricular mass. Circulation. October 25, 2005;112(17):2696-2702
Westaby S, Amarasena N, Ormerod O, Amarasena GA, Pillai R. Aortic valve replacement with the freestyle stentless xenograft. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Aug;60(2 Suppl):S422-7. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00278-s. PMID: 7646201
Commentary: Structural abnormalities after Freestyle full aortic root replacement: Time to accept the facts, Hughes, G. Chad, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Volume 165, Issue 4, 1301 – 1302
Nicolas Amabile, Olivier M. Bical, Alexandre Azmoun, Long-term results of Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis in the aortic position: A single-center prospective cohort of 500 patients, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Volume 148, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1903-1911, ISSN 0022-5223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.063.
Deleuze PH, Fromes Y, Khoury W, Maribas P, Lemaire S, Bical OM. Eight-year results of Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis in the aortic position: a single-center study of 500 patients. J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Mar;15(2):247–52. PMID: 16607908.
Bach DS, Kon ND. Long-term clinical outcomes 15 years after aortic valve replacement with the Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):544-51. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.08.047. Epub 2013 Oct 17. PMID: 24140209
Sweeney JC, Smith SA, Avula D, Trivedi JR, Slaughter MS, Ganzel BL. Aortic root replacement with Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis: 25-year experience. J Card Surg. 2021 Nov;36(11):4038-4042. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15910. Epub 2021 Aug 12. PMID: 34386993.
The Freestyle Aortic Bioprosthesis: A Systematic Review, Sherrah, Andrew G. et al. Heart, Lung and Circulation, Volume 23, Issue 12, 1110 – 1117, https://www.heartlungcirc.org/article/S1443-9506(14)00502-2/abstract
Kwok L. Yun, Colleen F. Sintek, Alden D. Fletcher; Aortic Valve Replacement With the Freestyle Stentless Bioprosthesis: Five-Year Experience; Circulation, Volume 100, Number suppl_2, https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.100.suppl_2.Ii-17
Vlad Gariboldi, Dominique Grisoli, Antoine Devin, Reoperation for Failure of Freestyle Bioprosthesis Using an Edwards Intuity Valve, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Volume 96, Issue 2, 2013, Pages e47-e48, ISSN 0003-4975,
Siamak Mohammadi, MD, Richard Baillot, MD, Pierre Voisine, MD, Structural deterioration of the Freestyle aortic valve: Mode of presentation and mechanisms, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:401-6; doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.056
Nobuchika Ozaki, Yutaka Hino, Yuji Hanafusa, et al. Perforation of the Valsalva Sinus After Implantation of Medtronic Freestyle Aortic Bioprosthesis; Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:2282–5; doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.04.074.
Ziyad Gunga, Salah Dine Qanadli, Guillaume Fahrni, et al. A word of caution: Spontaneous rupture of the noncoronary sinus of the Freestyle xenograft: Two cases and review of the literature; JTCVS Open 2022;11:59-61; doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.06.012.
Taichi Sakaguchi, Shigeru Miyagawa, Hiroyuki Nishi et al; Rupture of Valsalva Sinus After Aortic Root Replacement With Freestyle Stentless Bioprosthesis; Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95:1074 – 6; DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.129
Tomohiro Mizuno; Wall rupture of Medtronic Freestyle stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis; Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 7 (2008) 1129–1130; doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.183624.
Hanna H. Dagnegard, Kirstine Bekke, Solveig M. Kolseth, et al. Survival after aortic root replacement with a stentless xenograft is determined by patient characteristics; J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;164:1712-24; DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.07.011.
Silberman S, Shaheen J, Merin O, Fink D, Shapira N, Liviatan-Strauss N, Bitran D. Exercise hemodynamics of aortic prostheses: comparison between stentless bioprostheses and mechanical valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Oct;72(4):1217-21. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03064-8. PMID: 11603439.
Ennker JA, Ennker IC, Albert AA, Rosendahl UP, Bauer S, Florath I. The Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis in more than 1000 patients: a single-center experience over 10 years. J Card Surg. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):41-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00732.x. PMID: 19120674.
Qi Tong, Jie Cai, Zhengjie Wang; Recent Advances in the Modification and Improvement of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves; Jan 26, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202309844
Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Hao, J., et al. A study on comprehensive anti-calcification treatment technology for bioprosthetic valves. J Mater. Sci: Mater Eng. 20, 47 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40712-025-00263-2