Keywords
aortic valve
mechanical prosthesis
bioprosthetic prosthesis.
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction: In our country, the predominant condition treated in aortic valve surgery in its early stages was aortic valve disease of rheumatic origin, primarily in patients under the age of 60. In recent decades, due to lifestyle changes, increased average lifespan, and a shift in surgical treatment concepts among the elderly, there has been a noticeable trend towards atherosclerotic aortic valve disease treated surgically. This condition poses challenges in selecting the type of prosthesis for surgical replacement—either bioprosthetic or mechanical. The replacement of the aortic valve, aside from its undeniable benefits for patients, also introduces various complications, such as bleeding related to anticoagulation, thromboembolism, prosthetic endocarditis, and structural degeneration of the prosthesis. These complications vary between the two main groups of prostheses: bioprosthetic and mechanical. In this context, we are confronted with the challenge of selecting the type of prosthesis suitable for each patient.
This paper presents current issues regarding selecting aortic valve prostheses, considering factors related to the prosthesis and the patient. We will also discuss the trends in prosthesis usage in our country over the past decade.
Materials and Methods: We reviewed the types of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves used over the past ten years at our clinic, the Cardiac Surgery Service of the University Hospital Center "Mother Teresa.” We consulted articles, studies, and guidelines for managing heart valve diseases from European and American cardiology associations.
Conclusion: The choice of prosthesis for aortic valve replacement remains a current issue, involving considerations of patient-related and prosthesis-related factors. The decision is based on guidelines recommendations, surgical team judgment, and patient preference, following a detailed explanation of the benefits and risks associated with each type of prosthesis.
References
Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), Vahanian, A., Alfieri, O., Andreotti, F., Antunes, M. J., Barón-Esquivias, G., Baumgartner, H., Borger, M. A., Carrel, T. P., De Bonis, M., Evangelista, A., Falk, V., Iung, B., Lancellotti, P., Pierard, L., Price, S., Schäfers, H. J., Schuler, G., Stepinska, J., … Zembala, M. (2012). Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). European Heart Journal, 33(19), 2451–2496. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109
Rahimtoola S. H. (2003). Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 41(6), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02965-0
Sampaio R. O. (2019). How to Choose the Right Valve Prosthesis for My Patient?. Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 112(3), 302–303. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20190026
Pibarot, P., & Dumesnil, J. G. (2009). Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation, 119(7), 1034–1048. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.778886
Bove T. (2018). The choice of heart valve prosthesis for aortic valve replacement in the young: about choices and consequences. Annals of translational medicine, 6(10), 184. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.02.22
Chiu, P., Goldstone, A. B., Fischbein, M. P., & Woo, Y. J. (2019). Current evidence for prosthesis selection: What can we really say?. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 158(2), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.094
Suri, R. M., & Schaff, H. V. (2013). Selection of aortic valve prostheses: contemporary reappraisal of mechanical versus biologic valve substitutes. Circulation, 128(12), 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001681
Taylor K. M. (2003). The Edinburgh heart valve study. Heart (British Cardiac Society), 89(7), 697–698. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.7.697
Hammermeister, K., Sethi, G. K., Henderson, W. G., Grover, F. L., Oprian, C., & Rahimtoola, S. H. (2000). Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 36(4), 1152–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00834-2
Vahanian, A., Baumgartner, H., Bax, J., Butchart, E., Dion, R., Filippatos, G., Flachskampf, F., Hall, R., Iung, B., Kasprzak, J., Nataf, P., Tornos, P., Torracca, L., Wenink, A., Task Force on the Management of Valvular Hearth Disease of the European Society of Cardiology, & ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (2007). Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. European heart journal, 28(2), 230–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl428
Bartus, K., Litwinowicz, R., Sadowski, J., Filip, G., Kowalewski, M., Suwalski, P., Mazur, P., Kędziora, A., Jasiński, M., Deja, M., Kuśmierczyk, M., Czub, P., Zembala, M., Jemielity, M., Pawlaczyk, R., Tobota, Z., Maruszewski, B., & Kapelak, B. (2020). Bioprosthetic or mechanical heart valves: prosthesis choice for borderline patients? -Results from 9,616 cases recorded in the Polish national cardiac surgery registry. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 12(10), 5869–5878. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-19-3586
Danial, P., Girdauskas, E., Aissani, A., Debauchez, M., Lebreton, G., Leprince, P., Reichenspurner, H., Petersen, J., & Lansac, E. (2022). Outcomes of surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement for aortic insufficiency. Archives of cardiovascular diseases, 115(11), 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2022.08.001
Francica, A., Benvegnù, L., San Biagio, L., Tropea, I., Luciani, G. B., Faggian, G., & Onorati, F. (2024). Ten-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of third-generation biological prostheses in the aortic position. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 167(5), 1705–1713.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.10.023
Carrel, T., Vogt, P. R., Obrist, D., & Schaff, H. (2023). Evolving technology: the TRIFLO tri-leaflet mechanical valve without oral anticoagulation: a potential major innovation in valve surgery. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 10, 1220633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1220633
Brown, J. M., O'Brien, S. M., Wu, C., Sikora, J. A., Griffith, B. P., & Gammie, J. S. (2009). Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 137(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.015
Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, Capodanno D, Conradi L, De Bonis M, De Paulis R, Delgado V, Freemantle N, Gilard M, Haugaa KH, Jeppsson A, Juni P, Pierard L, Prendergast BD, Sadaba JR, Tribouilloy C, Wojakowski W; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 2021 Aug 28: ehab395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395
Otto, C. M., Nishimura, R. A., Bonow, R. O., Carabello, B. A., Erwin, J. P., 3rd, Gentile, F., Jneid, H., Krieger, E. V., Mack, M., McLeod, C., O'Gara, P. T., Rigolin, V. H., Sundt, T. M., 3rd, Thompson, A., & Toly, C. (2021). 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 143(5), e35–e71. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932
Rosu, C., & Soltesz, E. G. (2015). Selection of Valve Prostheses. Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 27(2), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.06.007
Casanegra, P., Avilés, G., Maturana, G., & Dubernet, J. (1975). Cardiovascular management of pregnant women with a heart valve prosthesis. The American journal of cardiology, 36(6), 802–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(75)90463-4
Birkmeyer, N. J., Birkmeyer, J. D., Tosteson, A. N., Grunkemeier, G. L., Marrin, C. A., & O'Connor, G. T. (2000). Prosthetic valve type for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: a decision analysis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 70(6), 1946–1952. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01863-4
Silberman, S., Oren, A., Dotan, M., Merin, O., Fink, D., Deeb, M., & Bitran, D. (2008). Aortic valve replacement: choice between mechanical valves and bioprostheses. Journal of cardiac surgery, 23(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00580.x
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.