Serum Procalcitonin Levels as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Secondary Peritonitis
AJTES Vol 10, No. 1, January 2026
Nagpal, L., et al. - Serum Procalcitonin Levels as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients..

Keywords

peritonitis
bowel perforation
emergency laparotomy
sepsis

How to Cite

Nagpal, L., Singh, S., Kaushik, R., & Kaur, J. (2026). Serum Procalcitonin Levels as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Secondary Peritonitis. Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 10(1), 1984-1988. https://doi.org/10.32391/ajtes.v10i1.510

Abstract

Introduction: Secondary peritonitis remains a formidable challenge in emergency general surgery, with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in surgical technique, postoperative complications—particularly surgical site infections (SSIs) and respiratory failure—remain common.

This study examines the prognostic utility of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as biochemical markers for risk stratification and prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with secondary peritonitis.

Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from February 2023 to April 2024, including 95 patients diagnosed with secondary perforation peritonitis. Serum PCT and CRP concentrations were measured at admission and 48–72 hours postoperatively. Patients were followed for 30 days. The primary clinical endpoints were ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, prolonged hospital stay, SSI, and 30-day mortality.

Results: The study cohort had an overall mortality rate of 13.7%. Statistical analysis showed that admission PCT levels > 1.28 ng/mL were a highly significant predictor of non-survival. Furthermore, a postoperative PCT threshold of >0.5 ng/mL at 48 hours was strongly correlated with the subsequent development of SSIs. Although elevated CRP levels were associated with adverse clinical trajectories, PCT demonstrated superior discriminative power for specific outcomes.

Conclusion: Serum PCT and CRP are robust predictors of mortality and morbidity in secondary peritonitis. Specifically, a PCT level > 1.28 ng/mL at admission provides critical prognostic information about survival, whereas postoperative PCT levels > 0.5 ng/mL facilitate early identification of SSI risk. These findings suggest that incorporating serial biomarker monitoring into clinical workflows can enhance risk-based decision-making. Larger multicenter trials are warranted to validate these thresholds.

https://doi.org/10.32391/ajtes.v10i1.510
Nagpal, L., et al. - Serum Procalcitonin Levels as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients..

References

Thompson J. The peritoneum, omentum, mesentery and retroperitoneal space. In: Williams NS, O’Connell PR, McCaskie AW, editors. Bailey & Love’s Short Practice of Surgery. 27th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2018. p. 1048–55.

Lu ML, Agarwal A, Sloan J, Kosmin A. Infected ascites: distinguishing secondary peritonitis from spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in a cirrhotic patient with classic symptoms. IDCases. 2017;8:29–31. doi:10.1016/j.idcr.2017.02.010

Jhobta RS, Attri AK, Kaushik R, Sharma R, Jhobta A. Spectrum of perforation peritonitis in India—review of 504 consecutive cases. World J Emerg Surg. 2006;1:26. doi:10.1186/1749-7922-1-26

Wichmann MW, Inthorn D, Andress HJ, Schildberg FW. Incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in surgical intensive care patients: the influence of patient gender on disease process and outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(2):167–172. doi:10.1007/s001340050041

Bhattacharya A, Singh R, Vajifdar H, Kumar N. Preoperative predictors of mortality in adult patients with perforation peritonitis. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2011;15(3):157–163. doi:10.4103/0972-5229.84897

Pupelis G, Drozdova N, Mukans M, Malbrain MLNG. Serum procalcitonin is a sensitive marker for septic shock and mortality in secondary peritonitis. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014;46(4):262–273. doi:10.5603/AIT.2014.0043

Ghosh PS, Mukherjee R, Sarkar S, Halder SK, Dhar D. Epidemiology of secondary peritonitis: analysis of 545 cases. Int J Sci Stud. 2016;3(12):83–88. doi:10.17354/ijss/2016/126

Meena LN, Jain S, Bajiya P. Gastrointestinal perforation peritonitis in India: a study of 442 cases. Saudi Surg J. 2017;5(3):116–121. doi: 10.4103/ssj.ssj_33_17

Bali RS, Verma S, Agarwal PN, Singh R, Talwar N. Perforation peritonitis and the developing world. ISRN Surg. 2014;2014:105492. doi:10.1155/2014/105492

Salamone G, Licari L, Falco N, Augello G, Tutino R, Campanella S, et al. Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) and elderly population: prognostic evaluation in acute secondary peritonitis. G Chir. 2016;37(6):243–249. doi:10.11138/gchir/2016.37.6.243

Chakma SM, Singh RL, Parmekar MV, Singh KHG, Kapa B, Sharatchandra KH, et al. Spectrum of perforation peritonitis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(11):2518–2520. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/5768.3596

Copyright (c) 2026 Lakshya Nagpal, Simrandeep Singh, Robin Kaushik, Jasbinder Kaur