Background: The most commonly used treatment modality for urethral strictures is the direct visual internal urethrotomy method according Sachse cold knife, but with low long-term success rate. Alternative method after failure is isurethroplasty with preputial flap or Buccal mucosa. The aim of this presentation is to report the efficacy of the Internal Urethrotomy with Holmium Laser (Sachse laser).
Material and methods: We report three cases of urethral stenosis after trauma which treated with Internal Urethrotomy with Holmium Laser (Sachse laser) after failure of multiple treatments with Sachse cold knife. We evaluated and compared the uroflowmetry parameters before and after Sachse laser.
Results: The average of uroflowmetry parameters before incision were: Q max 4.5 ml/sec, Q med 3 ml/sec. Voided Volume 323 cc, while after incision with Sachse laser were: Q max 30 ml/sec, Q med 12 ml/sec. Voided Volume 363 cc.No patients relapsed during follow-up time from 3 to 24 months.
Conclusion: Even though these are only a few cases, we think that Sachse laser is a valid alternative after unsuccessful Sachse cold knife and before Urethroplasty, even in patients with urethral stricture after trauma.
Das S. Urology in ancient India. Indian J Urol2007; 23: 2‑5.
Heyns CF, van der Merwe J, Basson J, van der Merwe A. Treatment of male urethral stricturespossible reasons for the use of repeated dilatation or internal urethrotomy rather than urethroplasty. S Afr J Surg. 2012; 50: 82-87.
Sachse H. Treatment of urethral stricture:transurethral slit in view using sharp section. Fortschr Page Med. 1974; 92: 12-15.
Dutkiewicz SA, Wroblewski M. Comparison of treatment results between holmium laser endourethrotomy and optical internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture. IntUrolNephrol. 2012; 44:717-724.
T. J. Greenwell, C. Castle, D. E. Andrich, J. T.MacDonald, D. L. Nicol, and A. R. Mundy, “Repeat urethrotomy and dilation for the treatment of urethral stricture are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 275–277, 2004.
S.Kamp, T. Knoll,M.M.Osman, K.U. K¨ohrmann, M. S.Michel, and P.Alken, “Low-power holmium:YAGlaser urethrotomy for treatment of urethral strictures: functional outcome and quality of life,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 38–41, 2006.
S. A. Dutkiewicz and M. Wroblewski, “Comparison of treatment results betweenholmium laser endourethrotomy and opticalinternal urethrotomy for urethral stricture,” InternationalUrology and Nephrology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 717–724, 2012.
J. L. Wright, H. Wessells, A. B. Nathens, and W. Hollingworth, “What is the most cost-effective treatment for 1 to 2-cmbulbar urethral strictures:societal approach using decision analysis,” Urology, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 889–893, 2006.
K. F. Rourke and G. H. Jordan, “Primary urethral reconstruction: the cost minimized approach to the bulbous urethral stricture,” Journal of Urology, vol. 173, no. 4, pp. 1206–1210, 2005.
Jain SK, Kaza RC, Singh BK. Evaluation of holmium laser versus cold knife in optical internal urethrotomy for the management of short segment urethral stricture. Urol Ann. 2014; 6: 328-33.
Pfalzgraf D, HäckerA.Sachse internal urethrotomy: endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures. Urologe A. 2013; 52: 657-61.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.